Inadmissibility to Canada because of terrorism

One of the pillars of the Immigration Act (IRPA) is to protect the safety and security of Canadians. Consequently, we have provisions that make some people inadmissible to Canada because of terrorism. These provisions affect both permanent residents and foreign nationals. However, Canadian citizens are immune to the inadmissibility rules.

What is inadmissibility due to terrorism or security reasons

Section 34 of IRPA covers inadmissibility because of security reasons. Terrorism falls under this section. Specifically, subsections (c) and (f) make a person inadmissible because of the following reasons, respectively:

  • engaging in terrorism,
  • being a member of a terrorist organization

According to subsection 34(f), a terrorist organization is “an organization that there are reasonable grounds to believe engages, has engaged or will engage in” terrorism.

Family members of a person who is inadmissible as a terrorist

If a person is inadmissible on terrorism grounds all their dependent family members also become inadmissible to Canada. Unfortunately, the inadmissibility affects both temporary residence and permanent residence applications. Moreover, it doesn’t matter if the inadmissible person is the principal applicant, an accompanying family member, or a non-accompanying family member.

What is terrorism?

Section 83.01 of the Criminal Code of Canada defines terrorist activities in detail. Unfortunately, the definition is too complicated and all over the place for the average Joe. The Government of Canada has published an article titled “Memorializing the Victims of Terrorism.” I highly recommend reading it to understand better how Canada perceives terrorist activities. Even that article does not come up with a clear-cut definition. However, by reading the paper and the Criminal Code, one could posit the following characteristics of terrorism:

  • The act is “in whole or in part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause.”
  • The intention is to intimidate the public or a government.
  • It targets security or economic security. Alternatively, the terrorist coerces a government or an entity to refrain from an activity.
  • A terrorist activity usually involves death or bodily harm. Consequently, terrorists use “violence; endangering a person’s life; risks posed to the health and safety of the public; significant property damage; and interference or disruption of essential services, facilities or systems.” (source: Government of Canada publications)

Keep in mind that terrorism in other countries could mean different. Therefore, when it comes to inadmissibility issues, we must consider those differences. Moreover, the public expectations and the pop culture could see terrorism differently. The bottom line is that it is tough to have an unequivocal definition for terrorist activities.

Terrorist organizations and terrorism inadmissibility

Membership in terrorist organizations results in inadmissibility. Luckily, despite ambiguities in the definition of terrorism, Canada has a clear list of terrorist entities. You may find the list on the Public Safety Canada website. Canadian authorities revise this list constantly and add or remove entities from the list. Interestingly, in a 2021 Federal Court decision, the Honourable Mr. Justice Manson casts the Court’s stance on the membership of those entities that are not on the list anymore. The case is Saeedi v. Canada. Mr. Saeedi has been a member of Mujahedin-E Khalq (MEK).

Canada considered this organization a terrorist entity between 2003 and 2012. Nonetheless, an officer determined Mr. Saeedi to be inadmissible on security grounds in 2019. Although MEK is not a terrorist entity, Mr. Saeedi was a member when it was a terrorist organization. Justice Manson sided with the officer and affirmed the terrorist inadmissibility. Consequently, just because the entity is not on the list does not mean you are off the hook.

Solutions to inadmissibility because of terrorist activities

Generally speaking, inadmissibility because of terrorism or other security grounds is extremely difficult to resolve. Regardless, some solutions do exist for this group. Keep in mind the idea is not to allow a dangerous person in Canada. I am confident no immigration officer or competent practitioner wants to see this happen. Nevertheless, there are convincing cases out there that reflect one or both of the following:

  • The inadmissible person is no longer a threat to Canadians.
  • The solid reasons for presence in Canada overcome inadmissibility.

If IRCC deems a person inadmissible on security grounds, they may not file a refugee claim in Canada. However, the following options could still exist for them.

PRRA – Pre-Removal Risk Assessment

If the affected person is inside Canada and subject to a removal order, they could apply for PRRA. Of course, some exceptions apply. Read the following article for more detail:

If the affected individual is a designated person, they could face more hurdles.

TRP – Temporary Resident Permit

A successful TRP application could allow this group to stay in Canada temporarily. However, they may never become a permanent resident. Read the following article for more information about TRP applications.

Judicial Review to fight terrorism inadmissibility

Inadmissibility because of terrorism does not prevent a person from filing for Judicial Review at Federal Court. Consequently, the person may do so at the determination time or if IRCC refuses their PRRA or TRP applications.

Ministerial Relief

If a person exhausts all avenues, they could still file for Ministerial Relief. However, the process is time-consuming and prone to failure. Read the following article for more information.

I do not want to give you false hopes. Although you could take these routes, the success rate is meagre.

Let us help!

If you face terrorism inadmissibility or other immigration issues, fill out the following form. Alternatively, you may book a private consultation session with me. For other visa and immigration applications, please fill out our assessment form.

    Full Name (required)

    Email (required)

    Have you entered your email address correctly?

    WhatsApp number(optional)

    Are you inadmissible to Canada?
    YesNoI don't know

    Have you received a removal order from Canada?
    Yes, DepartureYes, ExclusionYes, DeportationYes, type unknownNoI don't know

    Any other issues (select all that apply)?

    Do you believe humanitarian and compassionate grounds apply to you?
    YesNoI don't know

    Please explain the issue briefly:

    Upload a file that could help us better understand your situation - only PDF, JPG or PNG and less than 0.5MB

    Read this in Spanish 

    Related Posts

    PGWPs extension

    PGWPs expired after September 2021 will qualify for an additional work permit

    Jun 27, 2022
    delays in immigration

    New task force to improve delays in immigration applications

    Jun 27, 2022
    The sectors with the most job vacancies in Canada

    The sectors with the most job vacancies in Canada in 2022

    Jun 26, 2022

    What is an IRCC number?

    Jun 25, 2022

    Would you please fill out our free assessment form if you wish to visit or move to Canada? We will review it for free, but we will contact you only if we find an opportunity for you. Alternatively, you may book a consultation session. Consultation sessions are not free, but you will receive formal immigration advice from a licensed practitioner.

    Al Parsai, LLM, MA, DTM, RCIC
    Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant
    Adjunct Professor – Queen’s University – Faculty of Law
    Ashton College Instructor – Immigration Consulting
    Author – 88 Tips on Immigration to Canada

    Fill our Free Canada Immigration Assessment Form in your language!

    Disclaimer:
    This article provides information of a general nature only. Considering the fluid nature of the immigration world, it may no longer be current. Of course, the item does not give legal advice. Therefore, do not rely on it as legal advice or immigration advice. Consequently, no one could hold us accountable for the content of these articles. Of course, if you have specific legal questions, you must consult a lawyer. Alternatively, if you are looking for immigration advice, book an appointment.

    The characters and places in the articles:
    All the characters and locations in the articles are fictional, unless otherwise clearly stated. Therefore, any resemblance in names, dates, and places is coincidental.

    Important Notes:
    For our official addresses, trust this website only. We currently do not have offices outside Canada. Therefore, anyone who claims to be our agent is committing fraud. Also, note that we do not issue any work permits or study permits or similar documents. The government of Canada has the sole authority to issue such material.

    Click to read the disclaimer.

    Al Parsai

    Al Parsai is a Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (RCIC) in Toronto, Canada. He is an adjunct professor at Queen's University Law School and Ashton College. Al, who holds a Master of Laws (LLM) degree from York University, is a member of CICC and CAPIC organizations. Al, the CEO of Parsai Immigration Services, has represented thousands of applicants from more than 50 countries to the immigration authorities since January 2011.

    Do you have any questions?