Inadmissibility to Canada because of terrorism
One of the pillars of the Immigration Act (IRPA) is to protect the safety and security of Canadians. Consequently, we have provisions that make some people inadmissible to Canada because of terrorism. These provisions affect both permanent residents and foreign nationals. However, Canadian citizens are immune to the inadmissibility rules.
- Inadmissibility because of terrorism
- Defining terrorism
- Terrorist organizations
- Resolving inadmissibility
- Let us help!
Section 34 of IRPA covers inadmissibility because of security reasons. Terrorism falls under this section. Specifically, subsections (c) and (f) make a person inadmissible because of the following reasons, respectively:
- engaging in terrorism,
- being a member of a terrorist organization
According to subsection 34(f), a terrorist organization is “an organization that there are reasonable grounds to believe engages, has engaged or will engage in” terrorism.
Family members of a person who is inadmissible as a terrorist
If a person is inadmissible on terrorism grounds all their dependent family members also become inadmissible to Canada. Unfortunately, the inadmissibility affects both temporary residence and permanent residence applications. Moreover, it doesn’t matter if the inadmissible person is the principal applicant, an accompanying family member, or a non-accompanying family member.
Section 83.01 of the Criminal Code of Canada defines terrorist activities in detail. Unfortunately, the definition is too complicated and all over the place for the average Joe. The Government of Canada has published an article titled “Memorializing the Victims of Terrorism.” I highly recommend reading it to understand better how Canada perceives terrorist activities. Even that article does not come up with a clear-cut definition. However, by reading the paper and the Criminal Code, one could posit the following characteristics of terrorism:
- The act is “in whole or in part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause.”
- The intention is to intimidate the public or a government.
- It targets security or economic security. Alternatively, the terrorist coerces a government or an entity to refrain from an activity.
- A terrorist activity usually involves death or bodily harm. Consequently, terrorists use “violence; endangering a person’s life; risks posed to the health and safety of the public; significant property damage; and interference or disruption of essential services, facilities or systems.” (source: Government of Canada publications)
Keep in mind that terrorism in other countries could mean different. Therefore, when it comes to inadmissibility issues, we must consider those differences. Moreover, the public expectations and the pop culture could see terrorism differently. The bottom line is that it is tough to have an unequivocal definition for terrorist activities.
Membership in terrorist organizations results in inadmissibility. Luckily, despite ambiguities in the definition of terrorism, Canada has a clear list of terrorist entities. You may find the list on the Public Safety Canada website. Canadian authorities revise this list constantly and add or remove entities from the list. Interestingly, in a 2021 Federal Court decision, the Honourable Mr. Justice Manson casts the Court’s stance on the membership of those entities that are not on the list anymore. The case is Saeedi v. Canada. Mr. Saeedi has been a member of Mujahedin-E Khalq (MEK).
Canada considered this organization a terrorist entity between 2003 and 2012. Nonetheless, an officer determined Mr. Saeedi to be inadmissible on security grounds in 2019. Although MEK is not a terrorist entity, Mr. Saeedi was a member when it was a terrorist organization. Justice Manson sided with the officer and affirmed the terrorist inadmissibility. Consequently, just because the entity is not on the list does not mean you are off the hook.
Generally speaking, inadmissibility because of terrorism or other security grounds is extremely difficult to resolve. Regardless, some solutions do exist for this group. Keep in mind the idea is not to allow a dangerous person in Canada. I am confident no immigration officer or competent practitioner wants to see this happen. Nevertheless, there are convincing cases out there that reflect one or both of the following:
- The inadmissible person is no longer a threat to Canadians.
- The solid reasons for presence in Canada overcome inadmissibility.
PRRA – Pre-Removal Risk Assessment
If the affected individual is a designated person, they could face more hurdles.
TRP – Temporary Resident Permit
A successful TRP application could allow this group to stay in Canada temporarily. However, they may never become a permanent resident. Read the following article for more information about TRP applications.
Judicial Review to fight terrorism inadmissibility
Inadmissibility because of terrorism does not prevent a person from filing for Judicial Review at Federal Court. Consequently, the person may do so at the determination time or if IRCC refuses their PRRA or TRP applications.
If a person exhausts all avenues, they could still file for Ministerial Relief. However, the process is time-consuming and prone to failure. Read the following article for more information.
I do not want to give you false hopes. Although you could take these routes, the success rate is meagre.
If you face terrorism inadmissibility or other immigration issues, fill out the following form. Alternatively, you may book a private consultation session with me. For other visa and immigration applications, please fill out our assessment form.
Read this in Spanish
Would you please fill out our free assessment form if you wish to visit or move to Canada? We will review it for free, but we will contact you only if we find an opportunity for you. Alternatively, you may book a consultation session. Consultation sessions are not free, but you will receive formal immigration advice from a licensed practitioner.
Al Parsai, LLM, MA, DTM, RCIC
Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant
Adjunct Professor – Queen’s University – Faculty of Law
Ashton College Instructor – Immigration Consulting
Author – 88 Tips on Immigration to Canada
Fill our Free Canada Immigration Assessment Form in your language!
This article provides information of a general nature only. Considering the fluid nature of the immigration world, it may no longer be current. Of course, the item does not give legal advice. Therefore, do not rely on it as legal advice or immigration advice. Consequently, no one could hold us accountable for the content of these articles. Of course, if you have specific legal questions, you must consult a lawyer. Alternatively, if you are looking for immigration advice, book an appointment.
The characters and places in the articles:
All the characters and locations in the articles are fictional, unless otherwise clearly stated. Therefore, any resemblance in names, dates, and places is coincidental.
For our official addresses, trust this website only. We currently do not have offices outside Canada. Therefore, anyone who claims to be our agent is committing fraud. Also, note that we do not issue any work permits or study permits or similar documents. The government of Canada has the sole authority to issue such material.