Inland spousal sponsorship appeal in Canada
Sometimes your spouse or common-law partner lives with you in Canada. Consequently, if you are an eligible sponsor, you may consider sponsoring them in their immigration application. Moreover, we call these types of applications in-Canada class or inland applications, among other names. What if the immigration officer refuses your application? Is inland spousal sponsorship appeal an option in Canada?
- What is an inland spousal sponsorship?
- Why an inland spousal sponsorship application?
- The right to appeal an inland spousal sponsorship application
- Alternative options to an appeal
- Let us help!
Before discussing the right to appeal an inland spousal sponsorship, we need to know what an inland application is. Basically, you may sponsor your spouse or common-law partner under two programs: (1) inland or in Canada Class; (2) outside Canada. Of course, you may only pick option (1) if your spouse or common-law resides with you in Canada. However, option (2) is open to all spouses and common-law partners, regardless of their country of residence.
Needless to say, both the sponsor and the applicant must meet all the requirements. Therefore, I encourage you to read the following articles for more details:
Regardless of the right to appeal an application, people choose the inland spousal for the following reasons.
- You and your spouse or common-law partner stay together while waiting for the outcome.
- Since you are co-habiting, you expect a better chance of success (no credibility issues)
- Your spouse or common-law partner may receive an open work permit.
Of course, co-habitation does not guarantee success, but it could enhance your chances.
Under subsection 63(1) of IRPA, you can appeal the family class’s visa refusal. Consequently, you may assume in Canada class spousal sponsorship has the right to appeal. After all, it is a family class application. However, the problem is that subsection 63(1) limits the right to appeal to visa refusals only. When you are applying for an inland spousal sponsorship, you are requesting a change in status rather than a visa issuance. Therefore, this section does not apply to you.
Regardless, read Palma Izaguirre v. Canada (2012). The IRB decided they did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal because it was an in Canada class application. Furthermore, paragraph  of the IRB decision reads as follows:
 The applicant did not apply for a permanent resident visa. The visa is an authorization to enter Canada. The applicant filed an application to remain in Canada because he is already in Canada. Subsection 63(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, which gives the IAD jurisdiction in sponsorship matters, deals only with refusals to issue permanent resident visas. Therefore, the IAD does not have the jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
Unfortunately, based on this landmark decision, the right to appeal for inland spousal sponsorship applications does not exist.
Other case laws that are similar to Palma Izaguirre v. Canada (2012):
- Balla v Canada (Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration), 2014 CanLII 99928 (CA IRB)
- Richard v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 CanLII 100918 (CA IRB)
- Deoraj v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2004 CanLII 69612 (CA IRB)
While an inland spousal sponsorship appeal is out of the question, you have two alternative options:
- You may file for Judicial Review. Of course, you need to hire a knowledgeable lawyer to represent you.
- Ask for the officer’s notes, and then based on their concerns, apply again. However, make sure you can address all the concerns this time.
If you would like to sponsor your spouse or common-law partner to Canada, consider contacting us. Of course, we handle both outside Canada and inland spousal sponsorship applications. Therefore, fill out the following form, and we will contact you as soon as possible. However, if you are facing an immigration challenge, consider booking a consultation session with me.
If you wish to visit or move to Canada, please fill out our free assessment form. We will review it for free, but we will contact you only if we find an opportunity for you. Alternatively, you may book a consultation session. Consultation sessions are not free, but you will receive formal advice from a licenced practitioner.
This article provides information of a general nature only. Considering the fluid nature of the immigration world, it may no longer be current. Of course, the item does not give legal advice. Therefore, do not rely on it as legal advice or immigration advice. Consequently, no one could hold us accountable for the content of these articles. Of course, if you have specific legal questions, you must consult a lawyer. Alternatively, if you are looking for immigration advice, book an appointment.
The characters and places in the articles:
All the characters and locations in the articles are fictional, unless otherwise clearly stated. Therefore, any resemblance in names, dates, and places is coincidental.
For our official addresses, trust this website only. We currently do not have offices outside Canada. Therefore, anyone who claims to be our agent is committing fraud. Also, note that we do not issue any work permits or study permits or similar documents. The government of Canada has the sole authority to issue such material.