Unaccompanied Minors & Canada’s One-Year Refugee Claim Rule

Author: Al Parsai, LL.M, RCIC-IRB
Last Updated On: May 25, 2026
🌐Read in:EnglishEspañolفارسی

Canada has changed the eligibility rules for some refugee claims. The change matters to people who entered Canada after June 24, 2020, but waited more than one year before making a refugee claim.

The new rule appears in paragraph 101(1)(b.1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, or IRPA. In simple terms, this paragraph can make a refugee claim ineligible for referral to the Refugee Protection Division, or RPD, if the claimant entered Canada after June 24, 2020 and made the claim more than one year after entry. However, the Government of Canada has now created a temporary public policy for a narrow group of claimants. The policy may protect some unaccompanied minors from this new ineligibility rule.

This article explains the new one-year rule, the public policy, and who may still access the RPD even if a claim is made more than one year after entering Canada.

What paragraph 101(1)(b.1) says

Bill C-12 added paragraph 101(1)(b.1) to IRPA section 101. Section 101 deals with refugee claim eligibility. It tells officers when they cannot refer a refugee claim to the RPD.

Under paragraph 101(1)(b.1), a claim may become ineligible if both of the following apply:

  1. The claimant entered Canada after June 24, 2020, and
  2. The claimant filed the refugee claim more than 1 year after the date of entry.

The rule also deals with people who left Canada and returned. If a person entered Canada more than once after June 24, 2020, the one-year period starts from the first entry, not the most recent one.

This detail matters. A person cannot usually restart the clock by leaving Canada and returning.

Filing a claim is not the same as an RPD referral

People often say this rule stops someone from “filing” a refugee claim. That wording may create confusion.

The law focuses on referral to the RPD. A person may still try to make a claim. However, if an officer finds the claim ineligible under section 101, the officer must terminate the processing of the claim.

Therefore, the practical result can feel like a refusal to let the person proceed with a refugee claim. Legally, though, the key issue is eligibility for referral to the RPD.

The RPD cannot decide a claim that IRCC or CBSA does not refer to it.

The temporary public policy for unaccompanied minors

On May 19, 2026, the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration signed a temporary public policy for unaccompanied minors. The Canada.ca page was updated on May 20, 2026.

The official title is:

Temporary public policy to exempt unaccompanied minors, in Canada, from having their claim for refugee protection determined ineligible to be referred to the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada under the new ineligibilities

You may read the official public policy on the Government of Canada website:

Temporary public policy for unaccompanied minors

The policy recognizes a practical concern. Some minors do not have a parent or legal adult in Canada. They may struggle to understand the asylum process, gather documents, and present their case on time.

The policy creates a temporary exemption until the Government reaches a more permanent solution.

Who qualifies under the public policy?

The public policy does not cover every child. It only covers unaccompanied minors who meet the listed conditions.

A foreign national may qualify if:

  1. They made an in-Canada refugee claim under subsection 99(3) of IRPA; and
  2. They were under 18 years old when they made the refugee claim; and
  3. They had no parents in Canada, and
  4. They had no adult legally responsible for them in Canada.

All four elements matter.

A 17-year-old living in Canada with a parent will not fall under this public policy. A 17-year-old who lives with a legal guardian in Canada will also fall outside the policy.

The policy focuses on minors in Canada without a parent or a legally responsible adult.

What the exemption covers

The public policy may exempt qualifying unaccompanied minors from two new ineligibility provisions.

  • First, it may exempt them from paragraph 101(1)(b.1). This is the one-year ineligibility rule.
  • Second, it may exempt them from paragraph 101(1)(b.2). That rule affects some people who entered Canada irregularly along the Canada-United States land border, including waters along or across that border, and made a claim after the relevant regulatory time limit.

This article focuses mostly on paragraph 101(1)(b.1), because many people know it as the “one-year rule.”

Can someone claim refugee protection after more than one year in Canada?

Yes, but only in limited circumstances under this public policy.

A person who has been in Canada for more than one year may still have the claim referred to the RPD if they meet the public policy conditions. In plain language, they must be an unaccompanied minor at the time they make the claim.

For paragraph 101(1)(b.1), the strongest practical summary is this:

A claimant may still proceed despite the one-year rule if they made an in-Canada refugee claim while under 18 and had neither a parent nor an adult legally responsible for them in Canada.

The timing of the age assessment matters. The public policy considers the claimant’s age at the time of the refugee claim. A person who is now 18 or older may face a serious problem if they did not make the claim while still under 18.

The policy does not remove all eligibility issues

The public policy only deals with the listed ineligibility provisions. It does not confer refugee protection on the claimant. It also does not guarantee a hearing or a positive decision.

A claimant may still face other eligibility problems. For example, other section 101 issues may still apply. The claimant must also meet other requirements under IRPA.

If officers refer the claim to the RPD, the RPD must still decide its substance. The claimant must show that they meet the definition of a Convention refugee under section 96 or a person in need of protection under section 97.

Why this policy matters

The one-year rule can affect international students, workers, visitors, and other temporary residents who entered Canada after June 24, 2020. Some people may have had genuine fear for a long time. Others may face a new risk because conditions in their country of nationality have changed. However, paragraph 101(1)(b.1) can still create an eligibility barrier if they waited more than one year after entry.

The public policy gives unaccompanied minors special treatment because they face a unique vulnerability. They may not know the legal deadlines. They may depend on others. They may lack safe adult support. This does not create a general humanitarian exception for adults. It also does not create an exemption for all minors.

Common misconceptions

A child is not automatically exempt from the one-year rule.

The minor must be unaccompanied in the specific sense used by the public policy. They must have neither a parent nor an adult legally responsible for them in Canada at the time they make the claim.

A late claim does not automatically become eligible because the claimant faced hardship. The public policy gives officers authority to grant an exemption only when the claimant meets the listed conditions. It does not create a broad hardship exemption for everyone.

Leaving Canada and returning does not usually restart the one-year period. Bill C-12 added a multiple-entry rule. If the claimant entered Canada more than once after June 24, 2020, the clock starts after the first entry. The policy does not mean the RPD must accept the refugee claim. Finally, the policy only addresses eligibility for referral. The RPD still decides whether the claimant needs refugee protection.

Practical takeaways

People who entered Canada after June 24, 2020, should check the date of first entry before making assumptions about refugee claim eligibility.

For minors, the key question is not only age. The key question is whether the minor had a parent or a legally responsible adult in Canada at the time they made the claim.

For practitioners, the evidence should address the public policy conditions directly. Relevant evidence may include age documents, entry records, family information, guardianship documents, school records, child protection documents, and explanations about the absence of a parent or legally responsible adult in Canada.

For claimants, delay can have serious consequences. Anyone who fears returning to their country should obtain advice as early as possible.

Sources

All sources listed below were accessed on May 25, 2026.

Related Posts

Citizenship by Descent after Bill C-3: Canada’s New Rules Explained

Oct 3, 2026

Job Offer Genuineness: Why IRCC’s 2026 Work Permit Update Matters

Oct 2, 2026

Overseas Family in an In-Canada H&C Application: A Practitioner’s Guide

Oct 2, 2026

Express Entry Reform Could Replace Three Programs: What Happens Next?

Sep 29, 2026

If you are interested in visiting or immigrating to Canada, please complete our free assessment form.

There is no fee for this assessment. We will review your information and contact you if we identify a suitable immigration pathway or other meaningful option for you.

If you would prefer direct advice about your specific situation, you may book a consultation session. This is a paid service and includes formal immigration advice from a licensed Canadian immigration practitioner.

Al Parsai, LLM, MA, RCIC-IRB
Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant

Adjunct Professor, Queen’s University Faculty of Law

Instructor, Ashton College, Immigration Consulting Program

Author of 88 Tips on Immigration to Canada and Inadmissibility to Canada for Human Rights Violations

Complete Our Free Canada Immigration Assessment Form in Your Language:

English
Spanish
Persian

Disclaimer: The information on this website is provided for general informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current developments in immigration law. None of the authors or contributors to settler.ca are lawyers, and we do not provide legal advice. This content does not constitute legal or immigration advice and should not be relied upon as such. Accessing or using this website does not establish a consultant-client or any other professional relationship between you and Al Parsai or settler.ca. We make no warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information and disclaim liability for any errors or omissions.

Important Notes:
  • No Offices Outside Canada: We do not have any offices outside Canada. Therefore, anyone who claims to be our agent or representative outside Canada is committing fraud.
  • Official Contact Information: For our official contact information, please refer only to this website (settler.ca).
  • No Issuance of Immigration Documents: We do not issue work permits, study permits, or any other immigration documents. Only the Government of Canada has the authority to issue such documents.

Use of AI: We use AI tools, such as ChatGPT and Grammarly, to assist in generating content and images for this website. While we make reasonable efforts to review and monitor the materials, we cannot guarantee their accuracy, completeness, or compliance with current laws and regulations. AI-generated content may contain errors or omissions, and readers should not rely solely on this information without seeking professional advice.

Changes in Immigration Law: Immigration laws and regulations are subject to change without notice. If you have specific legal concerns, please consult a qualified lawyer. For personalized immigration (not legal) advice, you may book an appointment with Al Parsai, a Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (RCIC-IRB) and Member in Good Standing with the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants (CICC). We recommend verifying any information with official government sources or consulting a professional before making decisions.

Fictional Characters and Locations: Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all characters and locations mentioned in the articles are fictional. Any similarities to actual persons, living or dead, or real locations are coincidental.

Copyright Notice: © 2009-2024 settler.ca. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use, reproduction, or distribution of this content is strictly prohibited and may result in legal action.

Click to read the disclaimer.

Al Parsai, LL.M, RCIC-IRB

Al Parsai is a distinguished Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (L3 RCIC-IRB – Unrestricted Practice) hailing from vibrant Toronto, Canada. Al's academic achievements include an esteemed role as an adjunct professor at prestigious Queen's University Law School and Ashton College, as well as a Master of Laws (LLM) degree from York University (Osgood Hall Law School). A respected member of CICC, Al's insights are further enriched by his experience as the dynamic CEO of Parsai Immigration Services. Guiding thousands of applicants from over 55 countries through the immigration process since 2011, Al's articles offer a wealth of invaluable knowledge for readers.